Theorem wl-issetft 37049

Description: A closed form of issetf 3486. The proof here is a modification of a subproof in vtoclgft 3538, where it could be used to shorten the proof. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-issetft	⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem wl-issetft

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isset 3484	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2		nfv 1910	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfnfc1 2902	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		nfcvd 2900	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦)
5		id 22	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
6	4, 5	nfeqd 2910	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴)
7	6	nfnd 1854	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
8		nfvd 1911	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
9		eqeq1 2732	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
10	9	notbid 318	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
12	2, 3, 7, 8, 11	cbv2w 2329	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
13		alnex 1776	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
14		alnex 1776	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr3g 313	. . 3 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (¬ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
16	15	con4bid 317	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
17	1, 16	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1532   = wceq 1534  ∃wex 1774   ∈ wcel 2099  Ⅎwnfc 2879  Vcvv 3471

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1537  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-v 3473

This theorem is referenced by: (None)

Otomatik - 173.255.232.114 CloudFlare DNS Türk Telekom DNS Google DNS Open DNS

OSZAR »