hof2val - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > hof2val		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem hof2val 18255

Description: The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms ⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩:⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩⟶⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩ (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
hofval.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (Hom_F‘𝐶)
hofval.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
hof1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
hof1.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)
hof1.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
hof1.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
hof2.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)
hof2.w	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)
hof2.o	⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)
hof2.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋))
hof2.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
hof2val	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2^nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐺) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)))

Distinct variable groups: 𝐵,ℎ ℎ,𝐹 ℎ,𝐺 𝜑,ℎ 𝐶,ℎ ℎ,𝐻 ℎ,𝑊 · ,ℎ ℎ,𝑋 ℎ,𝑌 ℎ,𝑍 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑀(ℎ)

Proof of Theorem hof2val Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hofval.m	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = (Hom_F‘𝐶)
2		hofval.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
3		hof1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
4		hof1.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)
5		hof1.x	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		hof1.y	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7		hof2.z	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)
8		hof2.w	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)
9		hof2.o	. . 3 ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)
10	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9	hof2fval 18254	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2^nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋), 𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊) ↦ (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝑓))))
11		simplrr 776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → 𝑔 = 𝐺)
12	11	oveq1d 7441	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → (𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ) = (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ))
13		simplrl 775	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
14	12, 13	oveq12d 7444	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → ((𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝑓) = ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹))
15	14	mpteq2dva 5252	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) → (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝑓)) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)))
16		hof2.f	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋))
17		hof2.g	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊))
18		ovex 7459	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ∈ V
19	18	mptex 7241	. . 3 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)) ∈ V
20	19	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)) ∈ V)
21	10, 15, 16, 17, 20	ovmpod 7579	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2^nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐺) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 394 = wceq 1533 ∈ wcel 2098 Vcvv 3473 ⟨cop 4638 ↦ cmpt 5235 ‘cfv 6553 (class class class)co 7426 2^nd c2nd 7998 Basecbs 17187 Hom chom 17251 compcco 17252 Catccat 17651 Hom_Fchof 18247

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1789 ax-4 1803 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1963 ax-7 2003 ax-8 2100 ax-9 2108 ax-10 2129 ax-11 2146 ax-12 2166 ax-ext 2699 ax-rep 5289 ax-sep 5303 ax-nul 5310 ax-pow 5369 ax-pr 5433 ax-un 7746

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 846 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1536 df-fal 1546 df-ex 1774 df-nf 1778 df-sb 2060 df-mo 2529 df-eu 2558 df-clab 2706 df-cleq 2720 df-clel 2806 df-nfc 2881 df-ne 2938 df-ral 3059 df-rex 3068 df-reu 3375 df-rab 3431 df-v 3475 df-sbc 3779 df-csb 3895 df-dif 3952 df-un 3954 df-in 3956 df-ss 3966 df-nul 4327 df-if 4533 df-pw 4608 df-sn 4633 df-pr 4635 df-op 4639 df-uni 4913 df-iun 5002 df-br 5153 df-opab 5215 df-mpt 5236 df-id 5580 df-xp 5688 df-rel 5689 df-cnv 5690 df-co 5691 df-dm 5692 df-rn 5693 df-res 5694 df-ima 5695 df-iota 6505 df-fun 6555 df-fn 6556 df-f 6557 df-f1 6558 df-fo 6559 df-f1o 6560 df-fv 6561 df-ov 7429 df-oprab 7430 df-mpo 7431 df-1st 7999 df-2nd 8000 df-hof 18249

This theorem is referenced by: hof2 18256 hofcllem 18257 hofcl 18258 yonedalem3b 18278

W3C validator

	
		OSZAR »