![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 377 of 483) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-30721) |
![]() (30722-32244) |
![]() (32245-48210) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | tsxo3 37601 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsxo4 37602 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsan1 37603 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsan2 37604 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsan3 37605 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsna1 37606 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsna2 37607 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsna3 37608 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsor1 37609 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsor2 37610 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | tsor3 37611 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | ts3an1 37612 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | ts3an2 37613 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | ts3an3 37614 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | ts3or1 37615 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | ts3or2 37616 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | ts3or3 37617 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
A collection of theorems for commuting equalities (or biconditionals) with other constructs. | ||
Theorem | iuneq2f 37618 | Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | rabeq12f 37619 | Equality deduction for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
Theorem | csbeq12 37620 | Equality deduction for substitution in class. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) | ||
Theorem | sbeqi 37621 | Equality deduction for substitution. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | ralbi12f 37622 | Equality deduction for restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | oprabbi 37623 | Equality deduction for class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
Theorem | mpobi123f 37624* | Equality deduction for maps-to notations with two arguments. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐷 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝐸 = 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | iuneq12f 37625 | Equality deduction for indexed unions. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | iineq12f 37626 | Equality deduction for indexed intersections. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | opabbi 37627 | Equality deduction for class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
Theorem | mptbi12f 37628 | Equality deduction for maps-to notations. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷 = 𝐸) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸)) | ||
Work in progress or things that do not belong anywhere else. | ||
Theorem | orcomdd 37629 | Commutativity of logic disjunction, in double deduction form. Should not be moved to main, see PR #3034 in Github. Use orcomd 870 instead. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | scottexf 37630* | A version of scottex 9902 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | scott0f 37631* | A version of scott0 9903 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅) | ||
Theorem | scottn0f 37632* | A version of scott0f 37631 with inequalities instead of equalities. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | ac6s3f 37633* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, with bound-variable hypothesis. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | ac6s6 37634* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, moving the existence condition in the consequent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | ac6s6f 37635* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, moving the existence condition in the consequent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 20-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Syntax | cxrn 37636 | Extend the definition of a class to include the range Cartesian product class. |
class (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) | ||
Syntax | ccoss 37637 | Extend the definition of a class to include the class of cosets by a class. (Read: the class of cosets by 𝑅.) |
class ≀ 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | ccoels 37638 | Extend the definition of a class to include the class of coelements on a class. (Read: the class of coelements on 𝐴.) |
class ∼ 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | crels 37639 | Extend the definition of a class to include the relation class. |
class Rels | ||
Syntax | cssr 37640 | Extend the definition of a class to include the subset class. |
class S | ||
Syntax | crefs 37641 | Extend the definition of a class to include the reflexivity class. |
class Refs | ||
Syntax | crefrels 37642 | Extend the definition of a class to include the reflexive relations class. |
class RefRels | ||
Syntax | wrefrel 37643 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a reflexive relation.) |
wff RefRel 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | ccnvrefs 37644 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse reflexivity class. |
class CnvRefs | ||
Syntax | ccnvrefrels 37645 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse reflexive relations class. |
class CnvRefRels | ||
Syntax | wcnvrefrel 37646 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a converse reflexive relation.) |
wff CnvRefRel 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | csyms 37647 | Extend the definition of a class to include the symmetry class. |
class Syms | ||
Syntax | csymrels 37648 | Extend the definition of a class to include the symmetry relations class. |
class SymRels | ||
Syntax | wsymrel 37649 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the symmetry relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a symmetric relation.) |
wff SymRel 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | ctrs 37650 | Extend the definition of a class to include the transitivity class (but cf. the transitive class defined in df-tr 5260). |
class Trs | ||
Syntax | ctrrels 37651 | Extend the definition of a class to include the transitive relations class. |
class TrRels | ||
Syntax | wtrrel 37652 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the transitive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a transitive relation.) |
wff TrRel 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | ceqvrels 37653 | Extend the definition of a class to include the equivalence relations class. |
class EqvRels | ||
Syntax | weqvrel 37654 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the equivalence relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation.) |
wff EqvRel 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | ccoeleqvrels 37655 | Extend the definition of a class to include the coelement equivalence relations class. |
class CoElEqvRels | ||
Syntax | wcoeleqvrel 37656 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the coelement equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the coelement equivalence relation on 𝐴.) |
wff CoElEqvRel 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | credunds 37657 | Extend the definition of a class to include the redundancy class. |
class Redunds | ||
Syntax | wredund 37658 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the redundancy predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is redundant with respect to 𝐵 in 𝐶.) |
wff 𝐴 Redund 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 | ||
Syntax | wredundp 37659 | Extend wff definition to include the redundancy operator for propositions. |
wff redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) | ||
Syntax | cdmqss 37660 | Extend the definition of a class to include the domain quotients class. |
class DomainQss | ||
Syntax | wdmqs 37661 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the domain quotient predicate. (Read: the domain quotient of 𝑅 is 𝐴.) |
wff 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | cers 37662 | Extend the definition of a class to include the equivalence relations on their domain quotients class. |
class Ers | ||
Syntax | werALTV 37663 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the equivalence relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) |
wff 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | ccomembers 37664 | Extend the definition of a class to include the comember equivalence relations class. |
class CoMembErs | ||
Syntax | wcomember 37665 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the comember equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the comember equivalence relation on 𝐴, or, the restricted coelement equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) |
wff CoMembEr 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | cfunss 37666 | Extend the definition of a class to include the function set class. |
class Funss | ||
Syntax | cfunsALTV 37667 | Extend the definition of a class to include the functions class, i.e., the function relations class. |
class FunsALTV | ||
Syntax | wfunALTV 37668 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate, i.e., the function relation predicate. (Read: 𝐹 is a function.) |
wff FunALTV 𝐹 | ||
Syntax | cdisjss 37669 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoint set class. |
class Disjss | ||
Syntax | cdisjs 37670 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoints class, i.e., the disjoint relations class. |
class Disjs | ||
Syntax | wdisjALTV 37671 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the disjoint predicate, i.e., the disjoint relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a disjoint.) |
wff Disj 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | celdisjs 37672 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoint elements class, i.e., the disjoint element relations class. |
class ElDisjs | ||
Syntax | weldisj 37673 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the disjoint element predicate, i.e., the disjoint element relation predicate. (Read: the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint.) |
wff ElDisj 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | wantisymrel 37674 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the antisymmetry relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) |
wff AntisymRel 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | cparts 37675 | Extend the definition of a class to include the partitions class, i.e., the partition relations class. |
class Parts | ||
Syntax | wpart 37676 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the partition predicate, i.e., the partition relation predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅.) |
wff 𝑅 Part 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | cmembparts 37677 | Extend the definition of a class to include the member partitions class, i.e., the member partition relations class. |
class MembParts | ||
Syntax | wmembpart 37678 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the member partition predicate, i.e., the member partition relation predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) |
wff MembPart 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | el2v1 37679 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | el3v 37680 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. Inference forms (with ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V, ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V and ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V hypotheses) of the general theorems (proving ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → assertions) may be superfluous. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | el3v1 37681 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | el3v2 37682 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | el3v3 37683 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | el3v12 37684 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | el3v13 37685 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | el3v23 37686 | New way (elv 3475, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | anan 37687 | Multiple commutations in conjunction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | triantru3 37688 | A wff is equivalent to its conjunctions with truths. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Nov-2018.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bianim 37689 | Exchanging conjunction in a biconditional. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | biorfd 37690 | A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | eqbrtr 37691 | Substitution of equal classes in binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
Theorem | eqbrb 37692 | Substitution of equal classes in a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | eqeltr 37693 | Substitution of equal classes into element relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | eqelb 37694 | Substitution of equal classes into element relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | eqeqan2d 37695 | Implication of introducing a new equality. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | suceqsneq 37696 | One-to-one relationship between the successor operation and the singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} = {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | sucdifsn2 37697 | Absorption of union with a singleton by difference. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) ∖ {𝐴}) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | sucdifsn 37698 | The difference between the successor and the singleton of a class is the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | disjresin 37699 | The restriction to a disjoint is the empty class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | disjresdisj 37700 | The intersection of restrictions to disjoint is the empty class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∩ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)) = ∅) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |