![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rankxplim2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: If the rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal, so is the rank of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rankxplim.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
rankxplim.2 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rankxplim2 | ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0ellim 6426 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ∅ ∈ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | |
2 | n0i 4329 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) | |
3 | 1, 2 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
4 | df-ne 2937 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) | |
5 | rankxplim.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
6 | rankxplim.2 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V | |
7 | 5, 6 | xpex 7749 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V |
8 | 7 | rankeq0 9878 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
9 | 8 | notbii 320 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
10 | 4, 9 | bitr2i 276 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) |
11 | 3, 10 | sylib 217 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) |
12 | limuni2 6425 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | |
13 | limuni2 6425 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | |
14 | 12, 13 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
15 | rankuni 9880 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
16 | rankuni 9880 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
17 | 16 | unieqi 4915 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
18 | 15, 17 | eqtr2i 2757 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
19 | unixp 6280 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | |
20 | 19 | fveq2d 6895 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
21 | 18, 20 | eqtrid 2780 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
22 | limeq 6375 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) → (Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))) | |
23 | 21, 22 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))) |
24 | 14, 23 | imbitrid 243 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))) |
25 | 11, 24 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 = wceq 1534 ∈ wcel 2099 ≠ wne 2936 Vcvv 3470 ∪ cun 3943 ∅c0 4318 ∪ cuni 4903 × cxp 5670 Lim wlim 6364 ‘cfv 6542 rankcrnk 9780 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1790 ax-4 1804 ax-5 1906 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2101 ax-9 2109 ax-10 2130 ax-11 2147 ax-12 2167 ax-ext 2699 ax-rep 5279 ax-sep 5293 ax-nul 5300 ax-pow 5359 ax-pr 5423 ax-un 7734 ax-reg 9609 ax-inf2 9658 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3or 1086 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1537 df-fal 1547 df-ex 1775 df-nf 1779 df-sb 2061 df-mo 2530 df-eu 2559 df-clab 2706 df-cleq 2720 df-clel 2806 df-nfc 2881 df-ne 2937 df-ral 3058 df-rex 3067 df-reu 3373 df-rab 3429 df-v 3472 df-sbc 3776 df-csb 3891 df-dif 3948 df-un 3950 df-in 3952 df-ss 3962 df-pss 3964 df-nul 4319 df-if 4525 df-pw 4600 df-sn 4625 df-pr 4627 df-op 4631 df-uni 4904 df-int 4945 df-iun 4993 df-br 5143 df-opab 5205 df-mpt 5226 df-tr 5260 df-id 5570 df-eprel 5576 df-po 5584 df-so 5585 df-fr 5627 df-we 5629 df-xp 5678 df-rel 5679 df-cnv 5680 df-co 5681 df-dm 5682 df-rn 5683 df-res 5684 df-ima 5685 df-pred 6299 df-ord 6366 df-on 6367 df-lim 6368 df-suc 6369 df-iota 6494 df-fun 6544 df-fn 6545 df-f 6546 df-f1 6547 df-fo 6548 df-f1o 6549 df-fv 6550 df-ov 7417 df-om 7865 df-2nd 7988 df-frecs 8280 df-wrecs 8311 df-recs 8385 df-rdg 8424 df-r1 9781 df-rank 9782 |
This theorem is referenced by: rankxpsuc 9899 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |