Theorem goaln0 35036

Description: The "Godel-set of universal quantification" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
goaln0	⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝐴,𝑖

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑁(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem goaln0

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑥 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-goal 34985	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩
2		2on0 8509	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 2o ≠ ∅
3	2	neii 2939	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ¬ 2o = ∅
4	3	intnanr 486	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ¬ (2o = ∅ ∧ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩)
5		2oex 8504	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
6		opex 5470	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ ∈ V
7	5, 6	opth 5482	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩ ↔ (2o = ∅ ∧ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩))
8	4, 7	mtbir 322	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩
9		goel 34990	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩)
10	9	eqeq2d 2739	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩))
11	8, 10	mtbiri 326	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
12	11	rgen2 3195	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ ω ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)
13		ralnex2 3130	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ ω ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
14	12, 13	mpbi 229	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)
15	14	intnan 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
16		eqeq1 2732	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ → (𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
17	16	2rexbidv 3217	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
18		fmla0 35025	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)}
19	17, 18	elrab2 3687	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ (Fmla‘∅) ↔ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
20	15, 19	mtbir 322	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ (Fmla‘∅)
21	1, 20	eqneltri 2848	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)
22		fveq2 6902	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → (Fmla‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘∅))
23	22	eleq2d 2815	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)))
24	21, 23	mtbiri 326	. 2 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → ¬ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁))
25	24	necon2ai 2967	1 ⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2937  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3067  Vcvv 3473  ∅c0 4326  ⟨cop 4638  ‘cfv 6553  (class class class)co 7426  ωcom 7876  2_oc2o 8487  ∈_𝑔cgoe 34976  ∀_𝑔cgol 34978  Fmlacfmla 34980

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2699  ax-rep 5289  ax-sep 5303  ax-nul 5310  ax-pow 5369  ax-pr 5433  ax-un 7746  ax-inf2 9672

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3375  df-rab 3431  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-pss 3968  df-nul 4327  df-if 4533  df-pw 4608  df-sn 4633  df-pr 4635  df-op 4639  df-uni 4913  df-iun 5002  df-br 5153  df-opab 5215  df-mpt 5236  df-tr 5270  df-id 5580  df-eprel 5586  df-po 5594  df-so 5595  df-fr 5637  df-we 5639  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-res 5694  df-ima 5695  df-pred 6310  df-ord 6377  df-on 6378  df-lim 6379  df-suc 6380  df-iota 6505  df-fun 6555  df-fn 6556  df-f 6557  df-f1 6558  df-fo 6559  df-f1o 6560  df-fv 6561  df-ov 7429  df-oprab 7430  df-mpo 7431  df-om 7877  df-1st 7999  df-2nd 8000  df-frecs 8293  df-wrecs 8324  df-recs 8398  df-rdg 8437  df-1o 8493  df-2o 8494  df-map 8853  df-goel 34983  df-goal 34985  df-sat 34986  df-fmla 34988

This theorem is referenced by:  goalr  35040

Otomatik - 173.255.232.114 CloudFlare DNS Türk Telekom DNS Google DNS Open DNS

OSZAR »